>Depending on how it is written, there is no reason for anyone to be
>confused by the history of the dragons and Dark Creatures.  Maybe I am
>too black and white, but if the rules say, "there are no good dragons,
>and dragons can not be redeemed", I am not going to go looking for any
>good dragons.  Neither will I try to convert a bad one.  Am I too
>simplistic in my thinking, or in an expectation that people can (once we
>write it) understand and accept a simple statement so that they can play
>a game?
>
>Joe R

I suppose Pegusi to Dragons isn't that far of a move (physically speaking).
I forgot who proposed that idea, but I like it. Out of curiosity, is it
possible for a dragon to see the folly of his ways and help the
LightRaiders, even though he cannot be redeemed? (i.e. he knows he's
condemned, but he's decided to turn back and follow the OLMN anyway.) Is
that way too 'out there'? It's been a question I've thought about in the
real world as well. Now, obviously, the 'turncoat' dragon/demon would be
highly suspect of being 'up to something', simply because there's no gain
for them in such a move... they're ostracised by both sides. Comments?
							Nathan