>Sort of. (Boy, I didn't expect it to be this hard to explain. :-) > >What I am saying is this: > >1. God created angels. > >2. God created men. > >3. Both are intelligent creatures originally created to serve Him. The >only differences are that men are created "a little lower than the >angels," and that men have a dual nature: a body and a soul (or >physical and spiritual), while angels have a single, spiritual nature. > >4. Both fell, but in different ways (possibly because of their different >natures). When angels fell, the Fall was ascribed only to those >individual angels which fell. So you have unfallen angels and you >have fallen angels, or demons. When men fell, however, the whole >race (or species) fell; so there are no unfallen men (except for one-- >Jesus Christ, who is both God and man). > >5. God, through His great love and mercy, provided a way of salvation >for fallen men in the person and work of His Son, our Lord Jesus >Christ. He came to earth as a man, to redeem men. He kept the law >which we were unable to keep (i.e., He never sinned). Thus, He >deserved never to die, but He chose to sacrifice Himself and take the >punishment for sinners who would trust Him to take that punishment >for them. So now fallen men can be saved if they put their faith and >trust in Jesus Christ. But a way of salvation was not provided for >fallen angels. > >6. So, bringing all of this into DragonRaid: assume that God created >species of intelligent beings other than angels and men. We have no >idea if He did for real, of course (which is why I'd like to advocate >using a whole other universe for DragonRaid rather than having >EdenAgain be another planet in our own). Using the two scenarios we >have from the Bible, we can deduce how God might treat these other >beings: > > A. If the whole species falls, God may provide a sacrifice for them. > > B. If only some of the species falls, God may not provide a sacrifice >for them. Those fallen of the species become evil incarnate; those >unfallen of the species remain holy unto God. > >7. Since the original description of the dark creatures has them exiled >from other planets where only *some* of the species has fallen, >Option B is chosen. Therefore, dark creatures are a) Separate species >from men; b) fallen from grace, like men and fallen angels; and c) >unredeemable, like fallen angels. > >SO... > >They are not like angels or men, but are a wholly separate, >FICTIONAL entity. They have certain properties of men (i.e., physical >beings) and certain properties of fallen angels (evil incarnate; unable >to be redeemed). > >Whew!! I hope that was clear. To quote Rodney Dangerfield, I feel like >I just gave birth. :-) > >Your brother in Christ, > >-- >Rich Sezov I like it! Bravo! Nathan