paul said: > Sorry. I meant it's WRONG to still be using a screen that small in 1999. i second that. in fact, it was already wrong in _1989_, how ridiculous to be squinting at a black-and-white screen the size of an index card when a 25-inch color t.v. costs a few hundred bucks. and it's wrong today to still be using the small screens we are. (and in a landscape orientation, no less, when our paper-based world is portrait in nature.) the smallest screen we should ever have to deal with is the 9*12-incher we carry around as an electronic "slate", portable, but still big enough to display an 8.5*11 page at 100%. oops, i'm getting this list mixed up with my electronic-book list... :+) -bowerbird p.s. by the way, electronic books are very hot right now, have you noticed?