>... Seems as though one of Tedd's "commentaries" may have been more
>appropriate to what I think Phil may be trying to do.
>
>Joe Wilkins


Thanks Joe -- for a while, I was thinking that no one read my post -- or
perhaps I didn't make myself clear.

The point in the entire geometry problem in this tread is to figure out
what is happening and to overlay a set of known coordinates and conditions
on it. Once you have identified what's happening, then it's a simple matter
to figure out what's going to happen.

It appears to me that people are too concerned with the specific angles
when they should be looking at the coordinate system (i.e., trees v forest).

tedd

_______________________________________________________
http://sperling.com/