[futurebasic] Re: [FB] just the FACT's. Testers wanted

Message: < previous - next > : Reply : Subscribe : Cleanse
Home   : January 2001 : Group Archive : Group : All Groups

From: Joe Lewis Wilkins <PepeToo@...>
Date: Mon, 01 Jan 2001 22:41:20 -0800
Hi Waverly,

This is different than the "Profiler"?

Joe Wilkins

"Edwards, Waverly" wrote:

> Ladies and Gentlemen,
>
> After much sweat and loss of sleep, I have done a major rewrite of FACT, the
> code coverage analyzer.
>
>  A code coverage analyzer analyzes users code to determine what lines have
> code
> have been executed.  It also determines the frequency that lines of code
> have been executed.
>
> FACT
>
> @ is now up to 200% faster.
> @ tallies only executable lines
> @ displays stats in real-time
> @ has a maximum of 20000 lines per user file
> @ no known limitation on total lines of code
> @ sets comments to gray
> .
> It has been tested in standard and console runtimes.  I need more time to
> get it working with Objects and Tech runtime has not been tested.
>
> Major thanks to Robert Purves for pointing out where my code broke and
> providing the building blocks for identifcation of non-executable code.
>
> You can get the file at ftp://ftp.futurebasic.org/futurebasic/dropbox/
>
> The file name is:  FACTS.sea.hqx
>
> I wont be able to respond to mail for a few days, which is why I'm up so
> late getting this beta out.
>
> I am especially interested in big programs on older machines.  The largest
> programs I test were object runtime examples.  Even with the number of files
> and lines of code used in objects, it never took more than 34 ticks to
> analyze (not including startup time) all user code on a G3/233, even in 68K
> mode.
>
> Feel free to kick it around and send me an email.  Suggestions, comments and
> complaints, (yes complaints) are welcome.