Edwards, Waverly wrote:
> Gee, I thought that was going to be extremely painful.
> I recall having a similar issue (way back) in the days of
> fb2.  I recall it being much more difficult.  I guess
> that I made it more difficult than it had to be then.
> 
> Dont forget to fix the proc when you leave the function
> so that erasures still continue to work when needed.
> 
> What was step 3?
> 
> 

It might have been a bit painful, but fortunately I made some research 
before. I wrote an example that displays indices and exponents and I 
used a similar technique to patch QuickDraw (it is on the FB^3 CD BTW).
Perhaps, it is harder to achieve the same result with FBII, I can't 
remember, but for sure FB^3 is a giant step forward regarding 
programming ease.
As to step 3, I think it was "Go get a cup of coffee" (or 
exceptionnally a can of beer for Staz)
-- 
Cheers,

A. Pastor