thePrRecHdl& = PRHANDLE

thePrRecHdl&..prJob.iCopies%

Chris Young
______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________
Subject: Re: [FB] Print Util.fltr Bug and questions
Author:  GBeckman@...
Date:    3/19/98 9:23 AM



In a message dated 3/18/98 9:34:08 PM, you wrote:

>Yep! I like the thePrRecHdl&..prJob.iCopies% notation; it specifies that 
>you're looking at the print job subsection of the print record. But I've 
>seen way too many programs use {[PRHANDLE]+_iCopies%}, which of course is 
>way off. And AFAIK (I haven't tried it) you can't use 
>PRHANDLE..prJob.iCopies%, but must assign a handle of your own to point 
>at PRHANDLE. I was trying to give a "one liner".
  I have been following this closely, as I am guilty of not handling this
correcly.  I want to put this one to bed correctly and finally.  

Because I am confused by the 66 and 80 ofsets, could one of you smart fellers 
show the shortest way to assign the handle and then use 
PRHANDLE..prJob.iCopies%  

I was getting ready to use PRHANDLE..prJob.iCopies% as a one liner and now see 
that is not going to work...

Thanks in advance,

George
--
To unsubscribe, send ANY message to <futurebasic-unsubscribe@...>