On Thursday, Oct 2, 2003, at 15:32 Europe/London, Robert Covington 
wrote:

> On Thursday, October 2, 2003, at 10:25  AM, Bernie Wylde wrote:
>
>> I believe that the max memory allowed for a record is 32K.
>> In the following, must the total memory used by appRec plus cTypeRec 
>> plus cSubTypeRec be below 32K?
>
> Yep. I ran into this problem recently, but was posted to the beta list 
> about it.
> Gets some weird data overflow.
> I got around it by changing my approach, such that no one record was 
> getting so high up in the data required, and it was also from a rec in 
> a rec, using strings. I just split the approach to using separate 
> records , a pain, but works much nicer.
> Strings eat up memory like crazy being they can be so long and when 
> dimmed in mass quantity, as opposed to some 'INT'.
>
> But I am not sure I answered your question.  If you are getting weird 
> data returns from your records, that's it I'd bet though.

It seems to be working OK at the moment. Just thought I'd try to plan 
ahead (for once).

Bernie