On 17 Sep 2004, at 9:14, Robert Purves wrote: > Or perhaps it's going wrong because of the machine-tooled purity of > the code. May we assume that virtually all of your demo was generated > programmatically by a well-known FB4 utility? You most certainly can but I'd question the statement "well-known". And, if it =is= well-known, I wish the sales were directly proportional to its well-knownness ! > A moment ago I was amazed to find myself talking to the author of The > Window Maker, indeed interviewing him. > R: The stylistic precision of TWM code is noteworthy. Here I refer to > a property evidently despised by many FB programmers as icing, > cosmetic pedantry, or --- how cruel! --- iCandy. > B: Well, you should know. Didn't we have a long email correspondence > on this exact subject? > R: Er > B: Surely you remember trying to browbeat me into copying your own > stylistic idiosyncrasies? You didn't have to try very hard. I immediately accepted and incorporated your coding style without question. > ...the source code of The Window Maker has a very different style from > its products. Now... that is very, very true. > Personally, I'm into creative self-expression through code. > '~'A > ' No Re-DIM'd Vars : Off > '~'B > WINDOW #1:clear¬ > LOCAL > DIM RECORD gBETCHADONTKNOWWHATTHISIS4' > DIM o > DIM END RECORD .OZISE > local FN auntjemima&(a#,aPtr)'here is where we call the fn > DIM @PUDDLEDUCK%,102 UU$(93),BAK%,@BE% AS INT'dim statement > XREF TO_BE&(0);0'xref statment > DIM @T,L,B;0,BE,R;0,RR'this is the rectangle > t;8=WINDOW(_wndPointer)+_PortRECT'get wndPointer + the portRect stuff > "BAKAGAIN" > gBETCHADONTKNOWWHATTHISIS4.o(0) = 2'set the flag to 22 > IF R% AND((BAK)> 1)OR((NOT(RR))xOR(BAK%<=1)) THEN"BAKAGAIN" > FOR RR = 0 TO BE OR NOT( TO_BE):NEXT RR%'fix up the rr stuff > END FN'end of fn > FN AUNTJEMIMA& (0,17)'here is where we call FNAUNTJEMIM Hey! How did you manage to decompile that from my app? Thank you RP LOL :) BW