What we may loose is access to the toolbox stuff - particularly all the interface 
bits and pieces.

In FBtoC I assume we are linking to the Carbon Framework etc. In Xcode 3 the 
framework is still there.

I guess the question for the future is: Could one construct a scheme linking 
against the Cocoa framework? I cant see how but there are brighter people than 
me out there.

Quote from current talk "Cocoa is the future" HIToolbox post leopard no 
changes other than bug fixes. Can use things like HICocoaView.

Better go...

David

---- Original message ----
>Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 13:04:19 -0700
>From: Brian Stevens <bstevens33@...>  
>Subject: Re: [FB] Carbon, Cocoa & the Dodo Bird  
>To: futurebasic@...
>
>
>On Jun 14, 2007, at 11:07 AM, David Cottrell wrote:
>
>> I think it is important to remember that straight C will still be  
>> there and run in
>> 64bit.
>Our premise in writing FBtoC is standard ANSI C will not disappear  
>anytime soon, so this is good to hear.
>
>Thanks for the update David.
>
>Brian S.
>
>
>>
>> ---- Original message ----
>>> Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 13:17:13 -0400
>>> From: Paul Bruneau <paul_bruneau@...>
>>> Subject: Re: [FB] Carbon, Cocoa & the Dodo Bird
>>> To: futurebasic@...
>>>
>>>> On Jun 14, 2007, at 5:40 AM, Ken Shmidheiser wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> These discussions should be of great interest to FB programmers.
>>>> Yes, very interesting. Thanks Ken.
>>>
>>> I don't know, it was mainly about 64-bit carbon which is nothing to
>>> me. Yes carbon is bound to disappear _some_ day but that's a long
>>> time from now I think.
>>>
>>> --
>>> To unsubscribe, send ANY message to: futurebasic-
>> unsubscribe@...
>>>
>>
>> --
>> To unsubscribe, send ANY message to: futurebasic- 
>> unsubscribe@...
>>
>
>--
>To unsubscribe, send ANY message to: futurebasic-
unsubscribe@...
>