David Blache wrote:
>Once you get the concept of OOP in your head, the rest is a breeze, and I
>do mean a breeze.  The hardest thing about OOP is understanding the
>concept.  And as far as ease of programming goes, if you think PG is
>good, OOP will blow you away.

I aqppreciate your comments David, but what about those of us who don't use
PG all that much? Are we doomed to having to finally learn and use it all
now. ;)

I guess I mean will it be all that much harder for a non-PG user to understand?

What about he "manual" coder? (As I would call a non-PG user)

Here is a question: if somebody doesn't want to learn OOP, can they still
write in the "old" FB II style code-wise and still have it all work in FB^3?

Or will old programs have to be updated to include classes and properties
and objects to run, meaning we still have to learn the new stuff?

Thankee,

Robert Covington