[futurebasic] Re: [FB] Dynamic array of CoreFoundation types

Message: < previous - next > : Reply : Subscribe : Cleanse
Home   : July 2011 : Group Archive : Group : All Groups

From: Steve <mactech@...>
Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2011 12:36:56 -0400
Having worked with them the last couple of days, I can see what you are referring too in regards to the flexibility.

I am wondering about the speed, but that is secondary.

How are the dictionaries for larger files with 100,000+ entries?

regards

Steve

On Jul 18, 2011, at 11:51 AM, Brian S wrote:

> 
> On Jul 18, 2011, at 4:29 AM, Steve wrote:
> 
>>> I have large record structures comprised of CFStringRefs that are being converted to pascal strings and placed into the Dynamic array record structures.
> 
> 
> Steve - one reason I use CFDictionaries instead of FB Records/C Structs is the flexibility. Adding/removing fields from an FB Record requires the users to do a data conversion. CFDictionaries have no such issue.
> 
> 
> Brian S
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe, send ANY message to: futurebasic-unsubscribe@...
> To access the list archives, go to:  http://freegroups.net/groups/futurebasic/
>