[pastorsforum] RE: [PastorsForum] The original Christians

Message: < previous - next > : Reply : Subscribe : Cleanse
Home   : October 2005 : Group Archive : Group : All Groups

From: "Pastor David Warner" <dwarner@...>
Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2005 23:43:20 -0400
I don't know anything about these people but just want to toss this out
before retiring for the night.
The link for the entire book is:
http://www.pbministries.org/History/S.%20E.%20Anderson/the_first_baptist.htm

And, if you want to read about the havoc in a Baptist Church, read this:
Campbellism Exposed or, A History of Clear Creek Church
http://www.carthage.lib.il.us/community/churches/primbap/Campbellism.html

Bahahahahahaha
I'm going to sleep sweet tonight.  Nothing like tossing a couple email
grenades and running to bed.
Hehehehehehehehe

DWarner


THE FIRST BAPTIST
S.E. ANDERSON

PREFACE

Author: Do you think John the Baptist was the first Baptist?

Reader: What kind of Baptist do you mean? Southern? American? Conservative?
General? What do you mean by Baptist?

A: I mean New Testament Baptist. Forget about twentieth century Baptists for
now. Was John the first New Testament Baptist, or the first baptizer? If he
was not the first Baptist, who was?

R: I have read that John copied previous proselyte baptism. If so, he was
not the first to baptize.

A: But Jesus said, by implication, that John’s baptism was from heaven, even
as His own authority came from heaven (Matthew:23-27). His critics could not
say that John’s baptism was from men, or from a previous generation.
Everything in this passage, as in Mark 11:27-33 and Luke 20:1-8, seems to
say that John was the first baptizer, and therefore the first Baptist.

R: If so, what of it? Why bother about John the Baptist? Why not pay more
attention to the Lord Jesus?

A: That is the point. Most people ignore what Christ said about John the
Baptist. But Jesus praised John more than He praised any other person on
earth. If we follow Christ, we will try to understand better what He said
about John, why He commended him so highly, and what others say about John.
If we become more like John we might have more of Christ’s approval.

R: Now I get your message!

The purpose of this book is not to boast about any Baptists. No effort is
herein made to demonstrate a historical or chronological connection between
contemporary Baptists and John. Rather, it is hoped to present a connection
that is doctrinal, logical and Scriptural. Such a study should have lasting
values.

Briefly the mission of this book is similar in purpose to the mission of
John the Baptist. This book, we pray, will help—

1. To prepare the "way of the Lord" (Luke 3:4).

2. To make straight "a highway for our God" (Is. 40:3).

3. To cause people to "behold the Lamb of God" (John 1:29).

4. To make Christ manifest by explaining His baptism (John 1:31).

5. To reveal the "glory of the Lord" (Is. 40:5).

6. To restore the original meaning of "Baptist" (Luke 7:28-30).

7. To win Christ’s approval (Matthew:11).

Too long has John the Baptist been hidden by the Pedobaptist, dispensational
and interdenominational accumulations of doctrine, once cherished by this
writer.

This book attempts to reclaim the entire New Testament as the birthright for
every believer and the charter for every church.

The rich soil of the four Gospels, including John the Baptist, provides rich
nourishment for all Christians. As the tap-root gives strength to a mighty
oak, so the inspiration of the life of John the Baptist can invigorate every
person who takes him seriously. Christ honored him; dare we do less?

Grateful thanks are due to several competent scholars who read the original
manuscript. Most of their suggestions have been gladly used. Any remaining
errors are the author’s. Thanks also are due to publishers for valuable
quotations. May this volume make Christ better known and obeyed.

Stanley E. Anderson