Thanks Bro. Franklin, but most IFB do not consider ourselves 'denomination' anyway.
Bro. Derick is welcome to his opinion. Just like everyone else on the pastorforum.
Jeff
----- Original Message -----
From: "Pastor Franklin J. Senters" <fjsenters@...>
To: pastorsforum@...
Subject: RE: [PastorsForum] Is the Bible Inspired???
Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2005 08:43:38 -0500
>
> Wow
>
> This has gone from a discussion to a denomination bashing
>
>
>
> Derick, that's really not like you.
>
>
>
> Hummm
>
>
>
>
>
> Not sure I'll continue with this..
>
>
>
> Have fun hurting each other
>
>
>
> I'm done until this one is
>
>
>
> Pastor Franklin J. Senters
>
> Hebrews 2:12
>
>
>
> _____
>
> From: Derick Dickens [mailto:Derick@...]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 02, 2005 8:33 AM
> To: pastorsforum@...
> Subject: RE: [PastorsForum] Is the Bible Inspired???
>
>
>
> Steve,
>
>
>
> You got a point, he was not an independent fundy nor were any of the
> translators. They were against believers baptism and believed that the
> church and state should not be separate. Thus, my IFB brothers have to
> trace their trail of blood through the Anglicans.
>
>
>
> Derick
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Derick Dickens
>
> <http://www.thedickensfamily.org/>
>
>
>
>
>
> Pastor
>
> Wallers Baptist Church
> PO Box 95
> <http://maps.yahoo.com/py/maps.py?Pyt=Tmap&addr=PO+Box+95&csz=Partlow+VA+225
> 34&country=us>
> Partlow VA 22534
>
>
> derick@...
> www.thedickensfamily.org <http://www.thedickensfamily.org/>
>
>
> tel:
> mobile:
>
> 540-582-5703
> 540-894-1772
>
>
>
>
>
> <http://www.plaxo.com/signature> Signature powered by Plaxo
>
> <http://www.plaxo.com/signature> Want a signature like this?
>
>
> <https://www.plaxo.com/add_me?u=21475105341&v0=517300&k0=393677647> Add me
> to your address book...
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Steven G. Rockhill [mailto:revrock@...]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 02, 2005 12:12 AM
> To: pastorsforum@...
> Subject: Re: [PastorsForum] Is the Bible Inspired???
>
>
>
>
>
> Where is your proof for such a claim?
>
>
> You missed the point DW, it is the same proof that is available for the
> "Triquetra" claim, i.e. Rupert Murdoch's atheistic conglomerate.
>
> Though I am most certain that King James was the author in the "authorized"
> and that he was an Anglican (and maybe wore boots too) - everything else in
> between is sin.
>
> Peace,
> Steve
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Pastor David Warner wrote:
>
>
>
> Come on Steve. This is what Jerry L said he didn't like. Unsubstantiated
> claims tearing down character. This lie has been repeated so often (even on
> this forum) that it is believed and accepted by many who do not like the KJV
> and now believe they have good reason. Where is your proof for such a
> claim?
>
>
>
> DW
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Steven G. Rockhill [mailto:revrock@...]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 01, 2005 4:44 PM
> To: pastorsforum@...
> Subject: Re: [PastorsForum] Is the Bible Inspired???
>
> And King James - the "author" in "Authorized" was a homosexual a glutton and
> a drunkard and Anglican to boot (yikes). What's that prove?
>
> Peace,
> Steve
>
> Pastor Franklin J. Senters wrote:
>
>
>
> Does your NKJV have a Triquetra on it?
>
> That is also an interesting symbol found on a lot of New age materials.
>
> Have you ever studied where that came from?
>
> It came from which craft
>
> It is found on the book of chants and spells.
>
> And also on many NKJV Bibles
>
> Ever wonder why?
>
> Do you know who owns the copyright to the NKJV?
>
> Rupert Murdock and His conglomerate>
>
> A practicing atheist!
>
> There are a lot of things about that Bible that I really do not want to
> associate with.
>
> But have fun.
>
> Pastor Franklin J. Senters
>
> Hebrews 2:12
>
>
>
> _____
>
>
> From: Steven G. Rockhill [mailto:revrock@...]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 01, 2005 3:20 PM
> To: pastorsforum@...
> Subject: Re: [PastorsForum] Is the Bible Inspired???
>
> Frank,
> No where does it say here (and this is what is printed in my NKJV preface)
> that the NKJV is based on Westcott and Hort's text. Re-read it and you will
> see. The first mention of W&H is actually a criticism of something they
> proposed:
>
> B. Westcott and F. Hort taught that this text had been officially edited by
> the fourth-century church, but a total lack of historical evidence for this
> event has forced a revision of the theory.
>
>
> The second mention is just a statement of fact:
>
> More recently many have abandoned this Critical Text (which is quite similar
> to the one edited by Westcott and Hort) for one that is more eclectic.
>
> Alls this is saying is that many newer versions are based on W&H - but
> nowhere does it say that the NKJV is based on W&H or the other critical
> texts. In this section of the preface the translators are just presenting
> the different perspectives on manuscript usage. Notice what they say here:
>
> the editors decided to retain the traditional text in the body of the New
> Testament and to indicate major Critical and Majority Text variant readings
> in the footnotes.
>
> The 'traditional text' is the TR.
>
>
>
>
>
> Although these variations are duly indicated in the footnotes of the present
> edition, it is most important to emphasize that fully eighty-five percent of
> the New Testament text is the same in the Textus Receptus, the Alexandrian
> Text, and the Majority Text.
>
> Again notice that they are emphaizing that the variations are printed in the
> footnotes and not made in text itself. Read this preface again without the
> prejudice and you will see that nowhere do they mention that the basis for
> the NKJV is W&H.
>
> Peace,
> Steve
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, send ANY message to: pastorsforum-unsubscribe@...
>
> "In essential things, unity; in non-essential things, liberty; and in all
> things, charity."
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, send ANY message to: pastorsforum-unsubscribe@...
>
> "In essential things, unity; in non-essential things, liberty; and in all
> things, charity."
>
>
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, send ANY message to: pastorsforum-unsubscribe@...
>
> "In essential things, unity; in non-essential things, liberty; and
> in all things, charity."