And that is your opinion and you can have it. B-) > > While there were groups that broke off from the Roman Church and a > few reformers here and there who spoke out against Church polity > and doctrine, there is just no evidence that a sustained group of > churches existed parallel to the Roman Church until the > Reformation. The New Testament church within a hundred years of > the ressurection was already having problems. After Constantine > and especially after Flavius Theodosius, the church quickly became > universal (catholic) in it's government and practices. Over the > next several hundred years there were some great men (Augustine > comes to mind) who taught truth but elements of catholicism were > creeping in. By the 9th century, the church had become truly > Catholic. After that there are several groups who break away, > though still not completely orthodox in their theology (the > Lollards, Waldensians, etc). Not until the Reformation does the > Body of Christ truly have what I would call New Testament churches. > > But that's just my opinion. > > Mark > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Pastor David Warner > To: pastorsforum@... > Sent: Tuesday, January 03, 2006 7:54 PM > Subject: RE: [PastorsForum] Trail of Blood > > > Mark, Do you believe there were no "true to the Bible" churches > until the 16th century or perhaps until your church came along? > When do you think a real NT church first came into existence and > do you think once it came into existence it has remained or do they > come and go? > > DW > > -----Original Message----- > From: Mark McPherson [mailto:mark@...] > Sent: Tuesday, January 03, 2006 12:58 PM > To: pastorsforum@... > Subject: Re: [PastorsForum] Trail of Blood > > > Well the main thing is the low number of references (ie > footnotes or endnotes). Most of them have to do with events after > the 16th century anyway. > > He cites no historical document that there were Baptists > before the 16th century. And that is his claim. I can say there > have always been McDonald's since the time of Christ but if I don't > have historical record to back it up it is simply conjecture. > That's what this book is. That makes it bad scholarship. > > Pick up Cairns "Christianity through the Centuries" or > Leitzmann's "A History of the Early Church". Those will give you > examples of good scholarship. > > Mark > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Jeff Hallmark > To: pastorsforum@... > Sent: Tuesday, January 03, 2006 2:13 PM > Subject: [PastorsForum] Trail of Blood > > > > > So you think it is 'bad scholarship' well here is a link to > it, show us the 'bad scholarship' > > http://www.biblepreaching.com/trailofblood.html > > at your own time and leisure > > jeff > > > > > > "Trail of Blood". That was the name of the book that I > couldn't remember! Talk about bad scholarship. I've read some > poor writings on Church History but is one of the worst. > > Mark > > > > > > -- > To unsubscribe, send ANY message to: pastorsforum-unsubscribe@... > > "In essential things, unity; in non-essential things, liberty; and > in all things, charity." > > > > > -- > To unsubscribe, send ANY message to: pastorsforum-unsubscribe@... > > "In essential things, unity; in non-essential things, liberty; and > in all things, charity." > > > -- > To unsubscribe, send ANY message to: pastorsforum-unsubscribe@... > > "In essential things, unity; in non-essential things, liberty; and > in all things, charity." WARNING ALL EMAILS Subjects to NSA