[pastorsforum] Re: [PastorsForum] "A New Baptist Covenant"

Message: < previous - next > : Reply : Subscribe : Cleanse
Home   : January 2007 : Group Archive : Group : All Groups

From: gregS <greg@...>
Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 09:14:44 -0500
Derick, I don't like the "moderate" term either...

These items are listed as "moderate" views:
* Affirm the authority of the Bible in matters of salvation. Find  
some errors in areas such as science and history.
* The Bible contains/becomes the Word of God.
* Emphasize the necessity of theological diversity.
* Many are theistic evolutionists.

These are not "moderate"... These are "liberal"!
Was Christ "theologically diverse"? I don't think so....
If we don't believe that the Bible is the word of God then why preach  
it? (rhetorical)

gregS



On Jan 13, 2007, at 12:17 AM, Derick Dickens wrote:

> Jerry,
>
> I mentioned the idea of "Liberal Baptist" and most know that I am  
> careful in my labels that I issue.  I do not believe this is a  
> compliment whatsoever.  Liberal is opposed to conservative and is  
> in opposed to what most would call orthodox.  Carter, for instance,  
> believes that the conservative resrugence in the SBC is wrong.  Dr.  
> Danny Akin has a good chart that does make the difference.  He uses  
> "Moderate" instead of liberal, but for reasons I will not get into,  
> I don't like the use of the word "Moderate".  Here is the link
>
> http://baptistbanner.org/Subarchive_3/200%20Cnsvs%20&%20Mods% 
> 20Compared.htm
>
> Derick
>