[pastorsforum] Re: [PastorsForum] REVELATION CHAPTER 11

Message: < previous - next > : Reply : Subscribe : Cleanse
Home   : April 2004 : Group Archive : Group : All Groups

From: Alvin Smith <email@...>
Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2004 17:06:05 -0400
 For we know in part, and we prophesy in part.  But when that which is perfect 
is come, then that which is in part shall be done away.  When I was a child, 
I spake as a child, I understood as a child, I thought as a child: but when I 
became a man, I put away childish things.  For now we see through a glass, 
darkly; but then face to face: now I know in part; but then shall I know even 
as also I am known.

On Tuesday 27 April 2004 09:42 am, Steven G. Rockhill wrote:
> I think we all agree that the Book of the Revelation is 'truth' as it is
> Scripture.  But we do need to be careful about how we 'interpret' the
> 'truth' that is there.  There is truth presented literally (i.e.
> interpreted literally or as is or the plain reading of the text) and
> there is truth presented figuratively (i.e. use of imagery, symbolism
> and types).  Are the two witnesses actually two historic individuals or
> are they meant to be a picture (figure, symbol) of the confessing
> Church?  Is the description of the holy city in Rev. 21 a literal
> description or is meant to represent in human terms something that is
> beautiful beyond description?  Will  there be a literal temple or
> Revelation 21:22  22 But I saw no temple in it, for the Lord God
> Almighty and the Lamb are its temple.?  Is  Satan actually bound in
> literal chains?  Is the bear still Russia?  Is 666 literally going to be
> stamped on people's heads?  Is there going to be a literal battle of
> Armageddon?  Are there literally going to be apocalyptic horse riders or
> will they be driving SUVs? Are there literal lamps somewhere that
> represent each church? I will also add that saying that Elijah and Enoch
> are the two witness is not a literal interpretation because the names
> Elijah and Enoch are not literally in the text.  We must be careful not
> to be carried away by fanciful ideas and interpretations.
>
> Peace,
> Steve
>
> HStaiti@... wrote:
> > Derick,
> > We should interpret Revelation literally according to its genre. Its
> > genre is apocalyptic, and its structure is an epistle. It is a letter
> > written to convey literal truth about the circumstances the persecuted
> > churches of Asia faced from the Imperial Roman Empire, but it does so
> > through apocalyptic imagry and symbolism. Therefore, it uses
> > apocalyptic images to convey literal truth.
> >
> >
> > In a message dated 4/26/2004 10:34:52 PM Eastern Standard Time,
> > Derick@... writes:
> >
> >     I'm Back :)
> >
> >     Just a little note on the subject, everyone agrees that Revelation
> >     is symbolic, it is just what do we take as symbolic and what do we
> >     take as literal.  Sometimes John does not offer a literal
> >     interpretation of figurative languages on either side like he
> >     doesn't offer who the two witnesses are in Revelation.  People
> >     speculate it is Elijah and Enoch, but except for speculation we
> >     have not clue as to who these men are, or even if they are two
> >     different men and not symbolic.  For instance, Revelation
> >     12:13-17, some believe this is symbolic of Israel but that is no
> >     where explained in the Bible.  Some believe it is a part of Church
> >     history and the birth of the baby Jesus and a symbolic
> >     representation of salvitic history.  In that case, you must admit
> >     the second view is more literal because an actual birth has taken
> >     place, there was an actual persecution, the serpant (symbolizing
> >     Satan in all of Scripture) actually did try to destroy the woman
> >     and child, and the woman did run away into the wilderness.  Thus,
> >     the issue is not one taking it more literal and the other more
> >     figurative but what you take literal and what you take figurative.
> >
> >     Derick
> >
> >
> >
> > Peace to you,
> > Harry Staiti
> > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > Web: www.warecc.com <http://www.warecc.com/>
> > Profile of Harry Staiti <http://www.warecc.com/page3.html>
> > Profile of Our 2004 Campaign <http://www.warecc.com/page7.html>
> >
> > Ware Community Church - Commitment to Christ in Community
> > 8 South Street
> > Ware, MA 01082
> > 413 967 5191
> > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> >
> >--
> >To unsubscribe, send ANY message to:
> > pastorsforum-unsubscribe@...
> >
> >"In essential things, unity; in non-essential things, liberty; and in all
> > things, charity."

-- 
Alvin Smith